Ben-Gvir asks High Court to clarify A-G’s role after interim ruling in police case

The ongoing legal battle between National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Attorney-General Gali Baharav-Miara's office has reached a new stage, with Ben-Gvir urgently requesting clarification from the High Court. This move comes after an interim ruling that significantly curtailed his influence over police matters, a decision that has been met with strong objections from the minister.

Ben-Gvir's office accuses the Attorney-General's office of attempting to overstep the court's directive by seeking to lead discussions on draft procedures without the Prime Minister's Office's involvement. The minister insists that the court's order mandated a joint conferral between the Prime Minister, the minister, and the attorney-general to finalize these procedures. This dispute highlights a fundamental disagreement over the interpretation and implementation of the court's ruling, which aimed to establish clear boundaries for Ben-Gvir's authority.

“

The attorney-general’s office moved too quickly after the ruling.

At the heart of the matter are key questions regarding the appointment of senior police officials and the notification process for sensitive promotions. Ben-Gvir seeks to ensure that the established legal and governmental frameworks are adhered to, particularly concerning the prime minister's role in these critical decisions. The High Court's intervention is now crucial to resolve these ambiguities and prevent further escalation of the conflict, which has significant implications for the functioning of Israel's security apparatus.

“

Ben-Gvir argued that this ran against the court’s instruction that the prime minister, the minister, and the attorney-general confer in order to complete the work on the draft rules.