Blogger Claims Politician Violated Ankle Monitor Terms; Politician Cries Pressure

Blogger S. Malinauskas has asserted that Lithuanian politician Saulius Skvernelis violated the terms of his electronic monitoring device, claiming the politician communicated with Agne Silickiene, a former advisor and co-suspect.

Malinauskas detailed that Skvernelis allegedly broke a prohibition on contacting certain individuals, specifically Silickiene. He identified her as the crucial link connecting Skvernelis to a corruption scheme, suggesting that prosecutors believe money may have been funneled through her. Both Silickiene and Skvernelis are now reportedly under electronic monitoring, a situation Malinauskas notes makes their communication possible primarily through electronic means, which are easier to control.

Skvernelis, however, has publicly contested the necessity and proportionality of the stricter measure. He stated in parliament that the ankle monitor hinders his work and described the decision as disproportionate and a form of pressure. He maintains that he is not a flight risk, does not obstruct the investigation, and that the tightened restrictions lack legal basis. He has appealed the court's decision, viewing its purpose as intimidation rather than ensuring investigative integrity.

Malinauskas questioned Skvernelis's stance, emphasizing that electronic monitoring is a control mechanism, not a punishment, and that individuals must adhere to its conditions. He pointed out that if Skvernelis violated the terms, he should not blame others. The blogger highlighted the potential for undetected communication if Skvernelis were to use devices without surveillance or in areas without cameras, posing a challenge for law enforcement.