DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง United Kingdom /Energy & Infrastructure

California oil pipeline can continue operating after judge's ruling

From The Guardian · () English

Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Sources not specified Outcome reported
  • A judge ruled that a controversial oil pipeline off the California coast can continue operating, overriding state regulators and environmental groups.
  • The pipeline, previously shut down after a 2015 oil spill, was ordered reopened by the Trump administration citing national energy needs.
  • The judge found that a federal order under the Defense Production Act preempts state laws conflicting with the pipeline's operation, though the company was fined for violating a consent decree.

A federal judge has allowed a controversial oil pipeline off the California coast to continue operating, a decision that defies state regulators and environmental activists. The pipeline, located near Santa Barbara, resumed operations earlier this year following a directive from the Trump administration, which cited U.S. energy needs during the Iran conflict.

Finally, as the Court has now discussed, the DPA Order does, as a matter of law, preempt the enforcement of any state law that conflicts with Sableโ€™s ability to operate the Onshore Pipeline, including the trespass claim.

โ€” Judge Stephen WilsonIn his ruling allowing the controversial oil pipeline to remain in operation.

This system had been closed since 2015 after a significant oil spill, one of California's worst. Its reopening was intended to be managed under a federal consent decree. However, California officials had actively sought to prevent Sable Offshore Corporation from moving oil through its pipelines, labeling the company's actions as "egregious trespass on public land" that would inflict irreparable harm.

The Trump administration invoked the Defense Production Act (DPA), granting the president authority over industries for national defense purposes. The company argued this federal directive superseded state regulatory orders. Judge Stephen Wilson ultimately ruled that the DPA Order legally preempts any state law that conflicts with Sable's ability to operate the pipeline, including the trespass claim.

The Trump administration remains committed to putting all Americans and their energy security first. Unfortunately, some state leaders have not adhered to those same principles, with potentially disastrous consequences not just for their residents, but also our national security.

โ€” Chris WrightUS energy secretary, arguing for the pipeline's importance to national security and U.S. oil supply.

Despite allowing operations to continue, Judge Wilson also imposed a $1.5 million fine on Sable for violating the consent decree without proper authorization or court petition. Sable purchased the pipeline in 2024 and had been seeking to restart offshore oil production for over a year. The U.S. energy secretary, Chris Wright, asserted that restoring the pipeline would bolster U.S. oil supply and national security, criticizing state leaders for not prioritizing energy security. California Governor Gavin Newsom, however, accused Trump of using a manufactured crisis to benefit his oil industry allies, potentially polluting the state's beaches.

using this crisis of his own making to attempt what heโ€™s wanted to do for years: open Californiaโ€™s coast for his oil industry friends so they can poison our beaches

โ€” Gavin NewsomCalifornia Governor, criticizing the Trump administration's actions regarding the pipeline.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by The Guardian in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.