Chen Pei-chi challenges Chen Hsing-yu: 'Show proof of her hundreds of millions in property and NT$60 million clinic'
Translated from Chinese and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.
At a glance
- Chen Pei-chi, wife of former Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je, publicly questioned why her financial contributions to her children are viewed as corruption while those of dentist Chen Hsing-yu are praised.
- The dispute centers on differing views regarding education funds and property, with Chen Pei-chi demanding proof of Chen Hsing-yu's alleged self-earned wealth and significant financial transfers.
- Chen Pei-chi stated that her family's assets decreased during her husband's eight years as mayor, implying their funds were transferred to their children, contrasting with the public perception of Chen Hsing-yu's earnings.
A public spat has erupted between Chen Pei-chi, the wife of former Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je, and dentist Chen Hsing-yu, concerning financial matters related to their children. The controversy ignited following discussions about Chen Hsing-yu's ex-husband, Chao Chien-ming, and their children's NT$23 million education fund, where their views diverged.
Please post proof of Chen Hsing-yu's self-earned hundreds of millions in property, the NT$60 million clinic given to her ex-husband, and the NT$23 million education fund.
Chen Pei-chi took to social media to express her frustration, drawing a parallel between her own financial contributions and those of Chen Hsing-yu. She questioned why her NT$6.19 million contribution was labeled as corruption, while Chen Hsing-yu's earnings were lauded as those of a successful modern woman. This sentiment was met with online criticism, with some netizens asserting that Chen Hsing-yu's wealth was self-earned, unlike Chen Pei-chi's, which they implied was illicitly obtained.
In a fiery response, Chen Pei-chi challenged these critics, demanding they provide concrete evidence. She specifically asked for proof of Chen Hsing-yu's alleged self-earned hundreds of millions in property, the NT$60 million clinic transferred to her ex-husband, and the NT$23 million education fund. Chen Pei-chi stated that if proof of Chen Hsing-yu's financial dealings were insufficient, she would present her own financial documentation for comparison.
During Ko Wen-je's eight years as mayor, their assets did not increase but decreased. It's obvious the money went to the children.
Chen Pei-chi further elaborated on her family's financial situation, noting that their assets reportedly decreased during Ko Wen-je's eight years as mayor. She implied that their funds were likely transferred to their children, contrasting this with the public perception of Chen Hsing-yu's financial success. The dispute highlights a sensitive issue of wealth, public perception, and the scrutiny faced by public figures and their families regarding their finances.
Why is it that when I save NT$6.19 million for my children, it's considered corruption? But when others do it, they are praised as being good at earning money and are role models for modern women?
Originally published by Liberty Times in Chinese. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.