Commentary: Latest Excuse for US Tariffs Reaches Same Conclusion

The United States has repeatedly sought legal justifications for its imposition of tariffs, with the latest rationale centering on the issue of forced labor. This evolving argument, however, leads to the same conclusion as previous attempts to legitimize trade restrictions.

Deborah Elms, from the Hinrich Foundation, points out that the focus on forced labor as a basis for tariffs is not a new strategy in principle. It represents the latest in a series of justifications that have been put forward to support the administration's trade policies. The commentary suggests a pattern of seeking external validation for actions that may have other underlying motivations.

This recurring theme highlights a persistent search for a defensible legal or ethical basis for tariffs. Regardless of the specific justification cited at any given time, be it trade imbalances, national security, or now, forced labor, the outcome remains consistent: the implementation of tariffs. The commentary implies that the underlying objective of the tariffs remains constant, despite the shifting justifications.

“

US President Donald Trump’s tariffs were in search of a legal justification. Forced labour is the latest one, says Hinrich Foundation’s Deborah Elms.