Commentary: Panic is a billion-euro problem without a definition, argues Rob Boddice
Translated from Finnish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Researcher Rob Boddice argues that panic is a costly societal problem lacking a clear definition.
- Boddice, a historian at the University of Helsinki, focuses on the history of emotions, particularly in contexts affected by conflict.
- The article is a commentary piece discussing the societal impact and definition of panic.
Panic represents a significant and costly problem for society, yet it lacks a precise definition, according to historian Rob Boddice from the University of Helsinki. Boddice, whose academic career has often delved into the history of emotions, particularly within contexts marked by conflict and hardship, highlights the pervasive yet undefined nature of panic.
His research suggests that panic is deeply intertwined with various aspects of societal functioning. Despite its widespread impact and the substantial costs it incurs, the concept remains elusive, making it difficult to address effectively. Boddice's work on the history of emotions provides a unique lens through which to examine how panic has manifested and been understood throughout different historical periods.
The commentary piece, presented as a "Puheenvuoro" (Speech/Statement), implies that understanding and defining panic is crucial for mitigating its negative effects on society. By focusing on the historical context of emotions, Boddice aims to shed light on the complexities surrounding panic and its role in shaping societal responses to various events.
Panic is a very expensive problem for society, but it lacks a definition.
Originally published by Helsingin Sanomat in Finnish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.