DistantNews
Support us
Comptroller detects irregularities in Chancay port contract, seeks criminal action
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ช Peru /Crime & Justice

Comptroller detects irregularities in Chancay port contract, seeks criminal action

From La Repรบblica · () Spanish

Translated from Spanish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Documents & data Under investigation
  • Peru's Comptroller General's Office found deficiencies and non-compliance in the Chancay port contract and its amendments.
  • Irregularities include Proinversiรณn validating the contract with representatives lacking legal authority and the MTC approving amendments that benefited Cosco Shipping.
  • The audit recommends criminal action against officials from the National Port Authority (APN) and other bodies for their roles in the concessions.

Peru's Comptroller General's Office has identified significant irregularities and non-compliance in the processes surrounding the Chancay port contract, its investment addenda, port license, and environmental oversight. The audit highlights deficiencies by key authorities, including the Ministry of Transport and Communications (MTC), the National Port Authority (APN), and Proinversiรณn (the Private Investment Promotion Agency).

Specifically, Proinversiรณn is accused of validating and executing the investment contract with Terminales Portuarios Chancay (now Cosco Shipping Ports Chancay Perรบ) representatives who allegedly lacked the proper legal authority. Despite this, Proinversiรณn proceeded, submitting the contract to the MTC. The MTC not only signed the contract but also approved five addenda totaling US$789.6 million in investments. This resulted in Cosco Shipping receiving IGV (value-added tax) recovery benefits of S/527,797,756, to the detriment of the state, according to the Comptroller's compliance report.

The audit further details issues with the APN. In 2021, APN officials granted Cosco Shipping the port habilitation for the New Stage 1 of the multipurpose port terminal. In 2024, a second modification was approved, even though the investor submitted technical documentation that did not align with the current environmental certification regarding the tunnel's alignment. The APN also failed to enforce environmental protection measures, such as the Geotube System, during construction. During site inspections, APN officials did not compel the investor to adopt necessary measures when the tunnel's execution deviated from the agreed-upon alignment, allowing construction and operation to proceed without full compliance.

DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by La Repรบblica in Spanish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.