Court reviews law on determining start and end of Ramadan
Translated from Indonesian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- The Constitutional Court of Indonesia held a preliminary hearing on a judicial review of the Religious Courts Law concerning the determination of the start and end of Ramadan.
- The review challenges articles that grant authority to the Minister of Religious Affairs to determine the start of Islamic months based on moon sighting testimonies.
- Petitioners, who follow the astronomical calculation method (hisab), argue this system discriminates against their religious beliefs and lacks legal certainty.
Indonesia's Constitutional Court is reviewing a challenge to the Religious Courts Law that impacts the determination of Ramadan and Shawwal, the start and end of the fasting month and the Eid al-Fitr holiday. The case questions articles that empower the Minister of Religious Affairs to officially decree these dates based on moon sighting testimonies (rukyat hilal).
The judicial review was filed by three members of Muhammadiyah, a prominent Islamic organization, who adhere to the astronomical calculation method (hisab) for determining Islamic calendar dates. They argue that Article 52A and its explanation in the law, which mandates the Religious Courts to validate moon sighting evidence, grant official state recognition and national precedence to the rukyat hilal method.
According to the petitioners, this official endorsement of moon sighting leads to discriminatory treatment and a lack of legal certainty for those who follow the hisab method. They contend that the law's explanation, which focuses specifically on Ramadan and Shawwal, unnecessarily narrows the scope and adds new provisions not present in the main articles, as the Islamic year consists of 12 months.
The petitioners believe the current legal framework elevates the rukyat hilal method above hisab, creating a disparity in how different Islamic calculation methods are recognized by the state. This, they argue, infringes upon their constitutional rights and religious freedom by not affording equal legal standing to their chosen method of determining key religious observances.
Originally published by Republika in Indonesian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.