DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Canada /Culture & Society

Denying EI to women laid off after maternity leave violated Charter, appeal court rules

From Global News · () English

Translated from English and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.

At a glance

News Named sources Approved/passed
  • Canadaโ€™s Federal Court of Appeal ruled that denying employment insurance benefits to six Quebec women affected by maternity leave violated Section 15 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
  • The court struck down discriminatory provisions of the EI Act but suspended its declaration for one year.
  • The federal government now has 12 months to rewrite the law, which could affect thousands of women denied benefits under similar circumstances.

A Federal Court of Appeal ruling has sided with six Quebec women who were denied employment insurance after losing their jobs shortly before, during or after maternity leave. The judges found that withholding the benefits violated the equality guarantee in Section 15 of Canadaโ€™s Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

The case began in 2018. Some of the women did not have enough insurable work hours, while others had already reached the 50-week benefit limit. Sibel Ataogul, the applicantsโ€™ lead attorney, said the rules require people to accumulate a certain number of hours during the previous year, something women on maternity leave cannot do. The law allows an extension for people detained in prison, she said, but offers no similar provision for women on parental leave.

One of the grounds listed in section 15 is sex, and it is well-established that discrimination based on pregnancy and motherhood is sex-based discrimination.

· Federal Court of Appeal judgesThe judges explained why the denial of employment insurance breached the Charterโ€™s equality guarantee.

โ€œOne of the grounds listed in section 15 is sex, and it is well-established that discrimination based on pregnancy and motherhood is sex-based discrimination,โ€ the three-judge panel wrote. The court said the limits on combining employment insurance with maternity or parental benefits disproportionately affected women because women alone can receive maternity benefits and make up a large share of parental-benefit claimants.

Ataogul called the situation โ€œa perpetuation of decades and decades of sexism.โ€ She said women can remain disadvantaged compared with men who have children for an average of nine years after giving birth. The applicants were represented by the advocacy group Mouvement Action Chรดmage.

You need to have accumulated a certain amount of hours in the last year, but you wonโ€™t be able to accumulate those hours if youโ€™re on mat leave.

· Sibel AtaogulThe lead attorney described why maternity leave can prevent applicants from meeting the EI work-hours requirement.

The women initially won before the General Division of the Social Security Tribunal, which found that excluding them from EI during or after maternity leave amounted to gender discrimination. The Employment Insurance Commission challenged that ruling, and the Court of Appeal reversed it. The women returned to court in November 2025 and received notice of their victory on Wednesday.

The appeal court struck down the discriminatory parts of the EI Act but suspended the declaration for one year. The federal government therefore has 12 months to amend the legislation.

Itโ€™s really a perpetuation of decades and decades of sexism.

· Sibel AtaogulAtaogul criticized the continued effect of the employment insurance rules on women.
About this summary

Originally published by Global News in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.