Do not cut fuel taxes for everyone because one industry is struggling
Translated from Norwegian and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.
At a glance
- Aftenposten’s editorial argues that weak conditions in the construction industry should not lead to fuel-tax cuts for all Norwegian motorists.
- Fuel taxes rose again on September 1 after a period of politically calm, following a temporary reduction introduced during fears of an oil-price shock.
- The editorial says oil prices never reached the extreme levels that had been forecast, making the summer a period of historically cheap petrol.
Aftenposten rejects cheaper petrol for every motorist as the answer to hard times in Norway’s construction industry. The newspaper says one struggling sector should not determine fuel-tax policy for the entire country.
Fuel taxes rose again on September 1 with almost no political debate. The editorial says the political truce following the death of King Harald came at a convenient time for the Conservative Party, which had faced strong pressure to extend a period of unusually cheap motoring fuel, including pressure from party supporters around the country.
The temporary tax cut followed turmoil in the Middle East and an oil-price shock in the spring. But oil prices never reached the astronomical levels that had been feared, Aftenposten writes. As a result, the summer brought a period of historically cheap petrol.
The editorial identifies itself as expressing Aftenposten’s view, with the editor-in-chief and political editor responsible for its content.
Originally published by Aftenposten in Norwegian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.