DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Belgium /Health & Science

Doctor Caught Driving Under Influence Gets Alcohol Interlock After Responding to Patient

From VRT NWS · () Dutch

Translated from Dutch, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Sources not specified Outcome reported
  • A doctor in Sint-Genesius-Rode received a one-year alcohol interlock device and a fine after being caught driving under the influence for the second time.
  • The doctor claimed to be responding to an urgent patient call after drinking several specialty beers, but the judge emphasized that professional duty does not excuse driving with a blood alcohol level of 1.8.
  • The sentence includes a 3,200 euro fine and a 3-month driving ban, with half of each suspended, alongside the mandatory alcohol interlock.

A doctor in Sint-Genesius-Rode has been ordered to install an alcohol interlock device in his vehicle for one year after being caught driving under the influence of alcohol for the second time. The court also imposed a 3,200 euro fine and a three-month driving ban, with half of both penalties suspended.

I can understand that the Hippocratic Oath plays a role when a patient calls. But I would not want to be treated by someone with 1.8 alcohol in their blood.

โ€” The judgeThe judge explained the reasoning behind the sentence, emphasizing the severity of driving under the influence, especially for a medical professional.

The incident occurred on June 21, 2025, when the doctor was apprehended by authorities. His defense argued that he was at a party and had consumed several specialty beers when he received an urgent medical call from a patient. The lawyer stated that the doctor did not intend to drive that evening but felt compelled to respond out of professional duty.

However, the judge expressed a lack of empathy for the doctor's situation, stating, "I can understand that the Hippocratic Oath plays a role when a patient calls. But I would not want to be treated by someone with 1.8 alcohol in their blood." The judge also referenced a previous conviction for a similar offense, noting that a colleague had not imposed an alcohol interlock previously, leading to this repeat offense.

It was not the intention that he would drive that evening. Out of professional duty, he still chose to take the car.

โ€” The doctor's lawyerThe defense lawyer explained the circumstances that led the doctor to drive despite having consumed alcohol.

The defense highlighted the potential practical difficulties the alcohol interlock could cause, mentioning the doctor's pregnant partner and an expected difficult delivery. They also raised concerns about whether the company car's leasing agreement would permit the installation of the device, potentially forcing the doctor to purchase a new vehicle in addition to the 4,000 euro cost of the interlock itself.

His girlfriend is pregnant and a difficult delivery is expected.

โ€” The doctor's lawyerThe lawyer pointed out the potential practical and personal consequences of the alcohol interlock sentence.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by VRT NWS in Dutch. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.