DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡น Trinidad and Tobago /Health & Science

Doctor cleared in cerebral palsy case

From Trinidad Express · () English

Summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.

At a glance

News Documents & data Outcome reported
  • The Privy Council allowed obstetrician Marwan Abdullaโ€™s appeal in a medical negligence case involving a child born with cerebral palsy in 2002.
  • It ruled that the Court of Appeal had no proper basis to overturn the trial judgeโ€™s finding that Abdulla arrived at 4:30 a.m.
  • The council left the decision against Surgi-Med Clinic standing, meaning the related appeal by the childโ€™s mother was refused.

The Privy Council has cleared Dr Marwan Abdulla in a long-running medical negligence case involving Aeden Balwah, who was born with cerebral palsy in 2002.

Balwah was delivered by Caesarean section at Surgi-Med Clinic, where Abdulla had served as his motherโ€™s obstetrician throughout the pregnancy. After the diagnosis, Balwahโ€™s mother, Shelly-Ann Balwah, sued both Abdulla and the clinic.

In 2020, High Court Judge Kevin Ramcharan found that Abdulla and Surgi-Med had breached their duty of care, but ruled that the evidence did not prove the breach caused Balwahโ€™s cerebral palsy. The judge found that Abdulla arrived at 4:30 a.m., leaving too little time for the injury to have occurred during delivery. The condition was attributed to an event before birth rather than negligence during delivery.

In no sense could the decision that Dr Abdulla had arrived at 4.30 a.m. and attended delivery thereafter be categorised as rationally unsupportable. There was ample evidence to support it.

· The Privy CouncilThe council upheld the trial judgeโ€™s finding about Abdullaโ€™s arrival time.

The Court of Appeal upheld the findings against Surgi-Med but changed the finding concerning Abdulla. It concluded that he had arrived at 4 a.m., by which time partial prolonged hypoxic ischaemia had occurred, and that negligent management of labour and delivery had caused the cerebral palsy.

The Privy Council rejected that approach. It said the High Courtโ€™s finding about Abdullaโ€™s arrival time was supported by โ€œample evidenceโ€ and was not โ€œrationally unsupportable.โ€ The council also said the Court of Appeal should not have entered judgment against Abdulla on the substituted finding. Abdullaโ€™s appeal was allowed, while the decision concerning Surgi-Med remained in place.

The Board concludes that the Court of Appeal went too far too fast in entering judgment against Dr Abdulla on the basis of the substituted finding.

· Lady WiseShe summarized why the Court of Appealโ€™s ruling against Abdulla could not stand.
About this summary

Originally published by Trinidad Express. Summarized and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.