Does Slovenia Need Regions?
Translated from Slovenian and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.
At a glance
- Law professor Bojan Bugariฤ argues that Slovenia needs greater decentralization but not necessarily new regions.
- He says regions could help if they receive clear powers, adequate funding, democratic accountability and a genuine development role.
- The article says economic and political power remains heavily concentrated in Ljubljana, while 77.4% of Slovenian municipalities' revenue comes from state transfers, compared with 39.7% across the OECD.
Every time a new Slovenian government takes office, the question of whether the country needs regions returns to the political agenda. The coalition agreement of the new government again highlights decentralization and presents regionalization as one of the key ways to achieve it.
But these are two different questions, argues Bojan Bugariฤ, a law professor at the University of Sheffield. Slovenia clearly needs more decentralization. That does not automatically mean that creating regions is the right answer.
The article points to data showing that too much economic and political power is concentrated in Ljubljana. One figure is particularly stark: 77.4 percent of Slovenian municipalities' revenue comes from state transfers, compared with 39.7 percent in the OECD.
Regions could form part of the solution, Bugariฤ argues, but only if they have clearly defined responsibilities, sufficient financial resources, democratic accountability and, above all, a genuine development function.
Originally published by Delo in Slovenian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.