Exhibition Review: Is Landscape Painting Boring? Not at All, Hamin Exhibition Proves

Helsinki's art scene is buzzing with the 'Palava taivas' (Burning Sky) exhibition at HAM, which bravely pairs the distinct visions of two generations of Finnish landscape painters: Mauno Markkula and Petri Ala-Maunus. This exhibition challenges any notion that landscape painting might be a staid or uninteresting genre, proving instead that it can be a powerful medium for expressing profound, even apocalyptic, themes.

Mauno Markkula, a figure from the mid-20th century, is represented through his intensely colorful landscapes from the 1940s and 50s, where colors practically blaze. In contrast, Petri Ala-Maunus, born in 1970, presents meticulously detailed, often apocalyptic, visions. His large-scale works, some exceeding ten meters, have made him a familiar name in Finnish art circles, having been displayed in major institutions like Ateneum and Kiasma.

The decision by HAM to have the exhibition reviewed by critics from two different generations is a thoughtful curatorial choice. It acknowledges the generational dialogue inherent in the exhibition itself and promises a richer, more nuanced critical reception. This approach ensures that both the historical context of Markkula's work and the contemporary relevance of Ala-Maunus's art are fully appreciated.

From a Finnish perspective, landscape painting holds a special place in the national consciousness, often reflecting themes of nature, identity, and resilience. This exhibition, by juxtaposing these two artists, not only highlights artistic evolution but also invites contemplation on how the Finnish landscape, and the emotions it evokes, are perceived and represented across different eras. It’s a conversation about art, environment, and the enduring power of the painted image.