DistantNews
Support us
Expert: Tablet is sufficient for children up to 12th grade
๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡น Lithuania /Culture & Society

Expert: Tablet is sufficient for children up to 12th grade

From Delfi · () Lithuanian

Translated from Lithuanian and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.

At a glance

News Sources not specified Context piece
  • An expert states that computers and tablets are essential for children not only for accessing educational content but also for developing technological literacy.
  • He argues that the problem lies not with screens themselves but with how they are used, emphasizing the role of parents in shaping healthy digital habits.
  • While technology offers significant advantages in certain subjects, the expert also highlights the continued importance of handwriting for cognitive development.

Nerijus Paฤฤ—sa, founder and head of the "Eruditas" Lyceum, asserts that computers and tablets are crucial for children's education, extending beyond mere access to learning materials to foster essential technological literacy. These devices equip students with skills for information retrieval, task completion, project development, and the use of digital learning tools, preparing them for future challenges.

The problem is not the screen itself, but how it is used.

โ€” Nerijus Paฤฤ—saExplaining the expert's view on the impact of digital devices on children.

Paฤฤ—sa challenges the notion that screens are inherently harmful, noting that their presence in our lives is long-established. He contends that the issue is not the screen itself but its application. "Twenty or thirty years ago, children also played on computers," he observed. "Some spent less time in front of screens, others more, but the problem was the same." The increased mobility of devices today, he explains, has led to longer screen times, and parents sometimes use screens to occupy or calm children, which can foster dependency.

Twenty or thirty years ago, children also played on computers. Some spent less time in front of screens, others more, but the problem was the same.

โ€” Nerijus Paฤฤ—saComparing current screen time issues with past experiences.

Instead of demonizing devices, Paฤฤ—sa believes the focus should shift to usage habits, a responsibility he places primarily on parents at home. He points out that technology can significantly enhance learning in specific areas compared to traditional methods. For instance, repetitive calculation exercises in workbooks are less relevant to future needs than adaptive learning apps that provide immediate feedback and personalized practice. In STEM fields, technology can offer more than traditional classroom instruction.

It is pointless to perform various calculation tasks in workbooks when you only need to write the correct number or answer by hand, as this has little to do with what will be needed in life.

โ€” Nerijus Paฤฤ—saHighlighting the limitations of traditional learning methods compared to adaptive technology.

However, Paฤฤ—sa does not advocate for abandoning non-digital learning methods entirely. He stresses the enduring importance of handwriting, describing it as a vital part of the thinking process. Writing by hand demands full cognitive engagement, fostering genuine thought. Conversely, he notes research suggesting keyboard writing can become automatic, potentially reducing the depth of thinking applied to the text. This distinction is particularly relevant as text correction software becomes more prevalent.

Writing by hand requires complete concentration of the brain on this process. This means that when you write, you are actually thinking and developing your thinking.

โ€” Nerijus Paฤฤ—saEmphasizing the cognitive benefits of handwriting.
About this summary

Originally published by Delfi in Lithuanian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.