EXPLAINER: Why Jonathan may not be eligible to contest in 2027

The Punch newspaper delves into the constitutional debate surrounding former President Goodluck Jonathan's potential eligibility for the 2027 presidential election. This discussion is particularly relevant in Nigeria's dynamic political landscape, where opposition parties are reportedly seeking to court the former president amid internal crises. Jonathan's legacy, marked by his peaceful concession in 2015, positions him as a figure of national significance. However, the core of the issue lies in the interpretation of Section 137(3) of the 1999 Constitution, which prohibits individuals who complete another's term from serving more than a single additional term. The complexity arises because this provision was introduced by a constitutional amendment in 2017, after Jonathan had already left office. This temporal aspect has led to divided legal opinions on its retroactive application. The recent Federal High Court ruling in Akure, concerning Governor Lucky Aiyedatiwa's tenure, has added fuel to the debate. The court's interpretation, which suggests that executive officeholders cannot exceed constitutional limits even after completing a predecessor's term and winning an election, is being cited as a precedent that could impact Jonathan's case. From a Nigerian perspective, this legal wrangling is not merely academic; it touches upon the fundamental principles of democratic succession, electoral fairness, and the stability of the political system. The Punch's analysis highlights the intricate legal arguments and the potential implications for future elections, reflecting the ongoing quest for clarity and consistency in Nigeria's constitutional jurisprudence.

“

A person who was sworn-in as President to complete the term for which another person was elected as President shall not be elected to such office for more than a single term.