Fiji women's group questions $5,000 penalty for failing to assist police
Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- The Fiji Women's Crisis Centre (FWCC) is concerned about a proposed $5,000 fine for failing to assist police, arguing it doesn't protect vulnerable individuals.
- FWCC representative Linda Sanday stated that people should not be penalized for prioritizing their safety, especially in Fiji's current criminal climate.
- The center advocates for explicit exemptions in the bill for those at risk of harm, retaliation, or undue hardship, and calls for stronger safeguards on police powers.
The Fiji Women's Crisis Centre (FWCC) has voiced strong objections to a proposed provision in the Fiji Police Bill 2026 that could fine individuals up to $5,000 for failing to assist police when requested. FWCC argues that the proposed penalty fails to adequately consider the safety and vulnerability of many members of the public.
Linda Sanday, an FWCC representative, emphasized that individuals should not face penalties for prioritizing their own safety or that of their families. "This section fails to provide sufficient protections for elderly persons, persons with disabilities, pregnant women, caregivers, women in domestic violence situations, individuals suffering from illness and persons who may face retaliation or violence as a result of assisting police," Sanday stated. She highlighted that in Fiji's current criminal climate, those who assist police could become targets of intimidation, threats, or violence within their communities.
This section fails to provide sufficient protections for elderly persons, persons with disabilities, pregnant women, caregivers, women in domestic violence situations, individuals suffering from illness and persons who may face retaliation or violence as a result of assisting police.
FWCC Legal Services Manager Miliana Tarai acknowledged the bill's positive reforms but stressed the need for stronger safeguards. The organization advocates for recognizing a person's right to refuse assistance if it would place them at risk of physical harm, retaliation, or undue hardship. They are calling for explicit exemptions for individuals with disabilities, illnesses, pregnant women, caregivers, and those in domestic violence situations. The FWCC insists that ownership rights must be accompanied by decision-making authority for the legislation to fulfill its purpose.
We submit that the bill should recognise a personโs right to refuse assistance where doing so would place them at risk of physical harm, retaliation or undue hardship. Explicit exemptions should be provided for disability, illness, pregnancy, domestic violence situations, caregiving responsibilities and other areas affecting vulnerability.
Originally published by FBC News in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.