DistantNews
Support us
Finnish dental care reimbursements primarily benefit high-income earners, study finds
๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Finland /Economy & Trade

Finnish dental care reimbursements primarily benefit high-income earners, study finds

From Helsingin Sanomat · () Finnish

Translated from Finnish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Context piece
  • A Finnish study found that government dental care reimbursements primarily benefit high-income individuals.
  • Researchers question the cost-effectiveness of current Kela reimbursements, suggesting funds could be better used for public oral health promotion.
  • The study indicates that raising reimbursements has not shifted patients to private care or eased public dental service burdens, with benefits largely going to those who would have used private services anyway.

A recent study by the Finnish Competition and Consumer Authority (KKV) reveals that high-income earners are the main beneficiaries of Kela reimbursements for dental care. Researchers are questioning whether public funds allocated to these reimbursements could be more effectively utilized to promote oral health and improve access to care.

It is very rare for a patient using public dental care to switch to private services.

โ€” Riku BuriRiku Buri, research director at KKV, stated that increasing reimbursements has not achieved its goal of shifting patients from public to private dental care or reducing the load on public services.

In 2025, Kela reimbursements for private dental care amounted to nearly 56 million euros. The study suggests alternative uses for these funds. Dental care reimbursements were last increased in May 2025, following a rise in basic dental examination reimbursements from 15.50 euros to 30 euros in 2024. These increases were projected to raise public spending, and indeed, reimbursements grew by approximately 12 million euros, or 27 percent, between 2023 and 2025. The government's proposal anticipates further annual increases of about 12 million euros.

Riku Buri, research director at KKV, stated that increasing reimbursements has not achieved its goal of shifting patients from public to private dental care or reducing the load on public services. "It is very rare for a patient using public dental care to switch to private services," Buri explained. The study also examined treatment choices for individuals moving to new locations. While relocation often breaks ties with old providers, most patients maintained their previous choice between public and private care. Buri concluded, "Kela reimbursements have a very limited impact on patients' sector choices."

Kela reimbursements have a very limited impact on patients' sector choices.

โ€” Riku BuriBuri concluded that most patients maintained their previous choice between public and private care after moving to new locations.

The KKV report analyzed reimbursement cuts from 2015-2016 and increases in 2024-2025. "During the current government term, the use of private dental care services has not increased. It has remained at the level of the last government term," Buri noted. "This suggests that the beneficiaries of the reimbursement increase are those who would have used private dental care services even without the increase." The report found that the benefits of increased reimbursements have translated into lower prices for high-income clients. As early as November 2024, impact assessments for the government's proposal acknowledged that "low-income individuals' opportunities to use private services will continue to be worse than those of high-income individuals due to the out-of-pocket portion to be paid for services."

During the current government term, the use of private dental care services has not increased. It has remained at the level of the last government term. This suggests that the beneficiaries of the reimbursement increase are those who would have used private dental care services even without the increase.

โ€” Riku BuriBuri noted the lack of increase in private dental care usage despite reimbursement hikes.

This indicates the government was aware it would primarily serve high-income individuals when enacting these changes. The researchers linked dental care visit data with clients' socioeconomic backgrounds, finding that private dental care users earn significantly more than the Finnish average, are more often employed, and hold better socioeconomic positions. "The Kela reimbursement system cannot be justified in terms of income distribution, as it transfers income to people who are, on average, wealthier. It is an inefficient income transfer," Buri stated.

low-income individuals' opportunities to use private services will continue to be worse than those of high-income individuals due to the out-of-pocket portion to be paid for services.

โ€” Government proposal impact assessmentThe report referenced a government proposal's impact assessment from November 2024.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Helsingin Sanomat in Finnish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.