Former Prosecutor General Lee Won-seok: 'Zero Contact with Yoon Since Taking Office,' Defends Daejang-dong Probe as 'Legitimate'

As reported by The Hankyoreh, a newspaper dedicated to uncovering truths and upholding democratic principles, former Prosecutor General Lee Won-seok has made significant statements during a parliamentary hearing. His assertion that he had zero contact with then-President Yoon Suk-yeol after assuming the role of Prosecutor General directly addresses suspicions of undue influence in high-profile investigations.

“

I have never met, spoken with, or texted with then-President Yoon Suk-yeol even once after becoming Prosecutor General.

Lee’s defense of the Daejang-dong and alleged political prosecution cases is particularly noteworthy. By characterizing these as ‘residual cases’ inherited from the Moon Jae-in administration and emphasizing their ‘legitimate’ nature, he attempts to shield the prosecution’s actions from accusations of political bias under the Yoon Suk-yeol government. This framing is crucial for maintaining public trust in the judiciary, a trust that has been increasingly tested.

“

This case is a residual case that was passed down from the Moon Jae-in administration, not a new investigation.

However, Lee did not shy away from expressing his strong disapproval of the parliamentary inquiry itself. He unequivocally stated that the investigation violates the constitutional principles of separation of powers and the rule of law. His remarks, particularly his reference to the Supreme Court’s potential involvement in the Kim Yong case, highlight a deep concern within the prosecution service about legislative overreach into judicial processes. This tension between legislative oversight and judicial independence is a recurring theme in South Korean politics.

“

No one can be a judge in their own case. I believe this is contrary to the constitution and laws.

From The Hankyoreh’s perspective, Lee’s testimony, while defending the integrity of certain investigations, also underscores the politicization of the justice system. His criticism of the inquiry, while understandable from a legal standpoint, also raises questions about accountability. The public deserves transparency, and while we respect the separation of powers, we also believe that serious allegations of political manipulation in prosecutions warrant thorough and independent scrutiny, free from the very political pressures Lee himself seems to acknowledge exist.

“

Anyone who will be in charge of investigations and trials related to politicians and power in the future will certainly not exist.