Former Viðreisn Officials Oppose EU Accession Talks

Two individuals who previously held significant positions within Iceland's Viðreisn party have declared their intention to vote against resuming accession talks with the European Union. Sigríður María Egilsdóttir, who served as an alternate member of parliament for the party, and Kristófer Alex Guðmundsson, former chairman of Viðreisn's youth organization, are now publicly opposing the move towards EU membership.

“

The burden of proof lies with those who put this on the agenda.

Sigríður María Egilsdóttir is scheduled to articulate her stance at a public meeting organized by the "Áfram Ísland" (Forward Iceland) movement, alongside other prominent figures including former Prime Minister Katrín Jakobsdóttir. Her past parliamentary service included periods in 2018 and 2019 as a substitute for party leader Þorgerður Katrín Gunnarsdóttir.

“

The Euro: 'Yes' proponents have disappointed me significantly by convincing people that loans and the grocery basket will decrease without negative effects.

Kristófer Alex Guðmundsson, who resides in Spain, detailed his reasoning in a Facebook post. He argues that the burden of proof lies with proponents of EU accession. Guðmundsson expressed disappointment with the arguments presented by 'yes' proponents, particularly concerning the Euro. He contends that claims of lower loan costs and reduced grocery prices without negative consequences are misleading, pointing to Iceland's strong global position in purchasing power, low unemployment, and high homeownership rates.

“

Joining the EU for this is like shooting a bird with a cannonball.

Guðmundsson further elaborated that adopting the Euro would not automatically lower interest rates or inflation and would necessitate changes to Iceland's systems, including its labor market model. He likened the process of joining the EU for these reasons to "shooting a bird with a cannonball." He also highlighted the economic struggles within the EU, citing low growth and significant unfunded pension liabilities in major member states, which he believes could impose a substantial burden on Iceland. Regarding natural resources, Guðmundsson stated that while Iceland debates its quota system, it is widely considered superior to the EU's unsustainable model, and the same applies to energy production. He concluded that there is no escaping the EU's common resource policy and questioned Iceland's benefit in relinquishing its unique position for minimal gains.

“

The EU's economy is in tatters with almost no economic growth and the largest nations have unfunded pension liabilities many times their gross domestic product.