DistantNews
Support us

Four-month extension sought in Senasa corruption investigation

From Diario Libre · () Spanish

Translated from Spanish and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.

At a glance

News Named sources Under investigation
  • Prosecutors asked the Seventh Investigating Court of the National District for four more months to complete the Senasa corruption inquiry.
  • Prosecutor Rosa Alba García said pending work includes reports from state oversight bodies, the forensic institute and private companies, as well as analysis tracing the money under investigation.

The Dominican Republic’s Public Ministry is seeking four additional months to complete its corruption investigation into the National Health Insurance system, known as Senasa.

The request was presented to the Seventh Investigating Court of the National District. During the hearing, prosecutor Rosa Alba García told Judge Deiby Timoteo that investigators still awaited reports and expert examinations from the Comptroller General’s Office, the Chamber of Accounts, the National Institute of Forensic Sciences and private companies.

García said the processing of the evidence had taken longer because of the volume gathered during the investigation. Prosecutors also have pending work on the analysis of financial information.

That financial review is intended to establish the path taken by the funds under investigation and help determine possible financial responsibilities. The court must decide whether to grant the requested extension.

The request responds to pending reports and expert examinations from the Comptroller General’s Office, the Chamber of Accounts, the National Institute of Forensic Sciences and private companies.

· Rosa Alba GarcíaThe prosecutor explained why the Public Ministry is seeking a four-month extension.
About this summary

Originally published by Diario Libre in Spanish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.