From the Jakarta Charter to the Caliphate
Translated from Indonesian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- The Jakarta Charter, formulated in 1945, is a significant point in Indonesian Islamic political history, reflecting the struggle to integrate religious values into a pluralistic nation.
- A key clause, "Divinity, with the obligation to carry out Islamic law for its adherents," was removed from the constitution shortly after Indonesia's proclamation of independence due to concerns from eastern Indonesian figures and the need for national unity.
- Despite the compromise, the aspiration for Islamic values in the constitution continued, with efforts resuming after the 1955 elections in the Constituent Assembly.
The Jakarta Charter stands as a pivotal moment in Indonesia's political history, encapsulating the complex negotiations between Islamic and secular nationalist forces during the nation's formative years. Drafted by the Committee of Nine on June 22, 1945, the charter included a controversial first principle: "Divinity, with the obligation to carry out Islamic law for its adherents." This formulation underscored Islam's significant role in the nascent Indonesian state.
However, the charter faced immediate challenges. On August 18, 1945, just one day after the proclamation of independence, seven words from the charter were omitted from the constitution. Mohammad Hatta cited objections from figures in eastern Indonesia, who feared the implications for national unity. This alteration was met with resistance from Islamic leaders, including Ki Bagus Hadikusumo of Muhammadiyah, who viewed the charter as a hard-won agreement.
A strategic compromise was ultimately reached, driven by the urgent need to establish a stable government. This concession, from an Islamic political perspective, was seen not as a surrender of aspirations but as a tactical adjustment in a critical moment. Ki Bagus Hadikusumo, for instance, accepted the revised preamble's "Belief in the One and Only God" with the understanding of *tauhid*, the Islamic concept of monotheism. The removal of the seven words was thus framed as a political compromise made under duress, rather than a simple victory for secular nationalists.
Leaders like Kasman Singodimedjo and Mohammad Hatta reportedly persuaded Ki Bagus Hadikusumo by emphasizing the immediate necessity of adopting a constitution and electing a president. They suggested that Islamic aspirations could be pursued constitutionally once the nation stabilized and a People's Consultative Assembly (MPR) was formed through elections. This proved prescient, as the political struggle for Islamic values in the constitution resumed in the Constituent Assembly following the 1955 elections.
We must immediately have a Constitution and a President today. Later, after the country is stable and the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR) is officially formed through elections, Muslims can fight for the aspirations of the Jakarta Charter again constitutionally.
Originally published by Republika in Indonesian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.