Funding Source Doesn't Affect Social Security Contribution Obligation for Mandate Contracts with Employer
Translated from Polish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- A contract concluded with one's own employer generates combined income subject to social security contributions.
- The source of funding for the contract does not alter the obligation to pay contributions.
- This ruling clarifies the basis for calculating social security contributions for specific employment agreements.
A contract of mandate entered into with one's own employer results in combined income that forms the basis for calculating social security contributions. The Polish Supreme Court ruled that the source of funding for such an agreement does not exempt parties from their contribution obligations.
This decision clarifies that regardless of how the contract is financed, the total income earned under a mandate contract with an employer is subject to social security contributions. The ruling emphasizes the principle that all income derived from employment relationships, even those structured as mandate contracts with one's own employer, must be accounted for in social security calculations.
The court's clarification aims to ensure consistent application of social security laws and prevent potential circumvention of contribution obligations through specific contractual arrangements. The ruling underscores the importance of the actual nature of the employment relationship over its formal contractual form when determining social security liabilities.
Originally published by Rzeczpospolita in Polish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.