Hezbollah leader calls Lebanon-Israel deal 'grave mistake'
Translated from Romanian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem denounced the US-brokered framework agreement between Lebanon and Israel as "grave mistake" and "abandonment of sovereignty."
- Qassem declared the agreement "null and void," asserting it contradicts Lebanon's interests and legitimizes Israel's presence on Lebanese territory.
- The agreement aims for peace, security, and direct negotiations, with provisions for disarmament of armed groups and gradual Israeli withdrawal, but Hezbollah rejects any deal not aligned with Iran-US discussions.
Hezbollah's deputy leader, Naim Qassem, has strongly condemned the US-brokered framework agreement between Lebanon and Israel, labeling it a "grave mistake" and a "shameful abandonment of sovereignty."
In a statement released Saturday, Qassem declared the agreement "null and void," asserting that it "humiliates" and "shames" Lebanon. He accused the Lebanese government of legitimizing Israel's presence on Lebanese territory through this accord. Qassem insisted that the document contravenes Lebanon's interests and that only provisions aligned with the protocol signed between the United States and Iran on June 17, in the context of negotiations to end the war in Iran, would be considered valid. This protocol includes a clause on halting hostilities in Lebanese territory.
The framework agreement, as outlined by Le Figaro, aims for peace and security between Lebanon and Israel, with both nations reaffirming their intention to end the conflict and establish good neighborly relations. It proposes direct, US-mediated negotiations and establishes a Military Coordination Group to monitor implementation. A key provision involves the Lebanese army reasserting its authority over the entire territory following the verified disarmament of armed groups, which would lead to a gradual withdrawal of Israeli forces.
The Washington framework agreement is humiliating, shameful and represents an abandonment of sovereignty.
The agreement also stipulates that the Lebanese army will take control of designated "pilot zones" after disarmament, allowing civilians to return safely. Israel has stated it has no territorial claims, framing its military presence as a reaction to threats from armed groups. Additionally, the United States pledged to mobilize international support for Lebanon's reconstruction and economic recovery, with Lebanon committing to prevent funds from being diverted to armed factions.
Despite these provisions, Qassem reiterated Hezbollah's rejection of any understanding that does not align with the framework established by Tehran and Washington in their bilateral discussions. The group's stance highlights the deep divisions and complex geopolitical dynamics surrounding the potential normalization of relations between Lebanon and Israel.
This agreement is null and void.
Originally published by Adevฤrul in Romanian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.