Human rights minister warns parliament: Asset seizure law must not confiscate citizens’ property
Translated from Indonesian and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.
At a glance
- Indonesian Human Rights Minister Natalius Pigai urged parliament to draft the asset-seizure bill in proportionate terms and consistent with human rights principles.
- Pigai supports the bill as a tool against corruption and extraordinary crimes but warned against misuse that could target ordinary citizens.
- He said asset confiscation should rest on a valid court decision, particularly when property rights are at stake.
Indonesia’s proposed asset-seizure law has won support from Human Rights Minister Natalius Pigai, but he is warning lawmakers not to give the state power to take citizens’ property without judicial protection.
Pigai said the legislation could strengthen efforts to combat corruption and other serious crimes. At the same time, he called for the bill to be drafted proportionately and aligned with human rights principles.
“Drafting a law must take into account the consequences if it is misused to coerce the people,” Pigai said in a statement on Thursday. He added that, as human rights minister, he had a duty to remind the House of Representatives to formulate the measure carefully.
Drafting a law must take into account the consequences if it is misused to coerce the people. As human rights minister, I have a duty to remind the House of Representatives to formulate it carefully.
Pigai said protection of human rights, especially property rights, must remain the main priority. In his view, confiscation must be based on a valid court ruling rather than on the law alone.
“If the asset-seizure law targets not only corruptors but also ordinary people, on what basis would citizens’ property rights be confiscated solely under the authority of a law, rather than on the basis of a court decision?” he asked.
If the asset-seizure law targets not only corruptors but also ordinary people, on what basis would citizens’ property rights be confiscated solely under the authority of a law, rather than on the basis of a court decision?
Originally published by Republika in Indonesian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.