I Would Like to Use the Cycle Path More, but There Is One Problem

Svein Halvor Halvorsen says he would use cycle paths more often if he could trust them. Instead, he relies on main roads because they form a clear, signposted network that leads to known destinations.

He argues that cycle and pedestrian paths often function as isolated local projects. They may turn toward a school, end at a bus stop or disappear into a residential area. Even a well-paved section can suddenly give way to frost damage, gravel and exposed roots.

The problem is also uncertainty. A blue sign and smooth pavement may offer no clear indication of whether a path leads to a neighbouring town or a primary school. Halvorsen says cyclists may therefore stay on the main road, only to discover later that they should have taken the cycle path. In such cases, a barrier or ditch can separate them from the route they missed.

“

I cannot rely on the cycle path. I can rely on the main road.

He describes a summer ride from Sandefjord to Skien. Near Porsgrunn, a small reddish-brown cycle sign pointed toward Kjose. Because he did not know whether Kjose lay on his route or marked a detour, he continued on the road. Later, he found himself on a structure over the E18 surrounded by ramps and roundabouts, with fast-moving cars entering from the motorway.

Halvorsen cites the Norwegian Public Roads Administration’s view that clear signs are necessary for safe and efficient traffic flow. He also notes that only half of Norway’s national cycle routes are signposted, according to the agency.

“

Does it take me to the neighbouring town or to the primary school? I have no idea!