Illicit Arms: Ribadu backs fresh national survey, says 2016 data outdated
Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Nigeria's National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu, supports a new survey on illicit arms, stating 2016 data is outdated.
- Ribadu highlighted the need for credible evidence to address the proliferation of small arms and light weapons, which fuels various security threats.
- He emphasized a comprehensive approach involving government, society, and international partners to combat the issue.
National Security Adviser (NSA) Mallam Nuhu Ribadu has endorsed plans for a new National Baseline Survey on illicit small arms and light weapons. Ribadu stated that Nigeria must update its outdated 2016 data and address identified gaps in methodology and coordination from the previous exercise.
The proliferation of illicit small arms and light weapons is not an abstract policy concern. It is a deadly threat to the safety of our people.
The proposed survey, Ribadu explained, is crucial for gathering credible evidence on the scale, distribution, and movement of illicit weapons across Nigeria. This information will strengthen the government's response to security challenges, including banditry, communal conflicts, farmer-herder clashes, organized crime, terrorism, and insurgency. He emphasized that the proliferation of these weapons poses a deadly threat to public safety.
Speaking through Mr. Solomon Feyintola, Director of External Affairs in the Office of the NSA, at a workshop reviewing the 2016 survey, Ribadu stressed that government responses must be evidence-based, not based on estimates. He acknowledged the 2016 survey's value in shaping policies and establishing institutions like the National Centre for the Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons (NCCSALW). However, he also pointed out the challenges that necessitate an honest review before launching a new survey.
Governmentโs response to this threat cannot be based on guesswork. It must be built on evidence.
Ribadu described an accurate national baseline as a strategic security asset that can improve the targeting of counter-proliferation and disarmament efforts. He also called for a comprehensive approach involving all sectors of government and society, including security agencies, local governments, traditional and religious institutions, civil society organizations, and communities. International partnerships were also highlighted as essential, with the NSA welcoming the participation of UN officials.
Before we launch into the next National Baseline Survey, we owe ourselves the discipline of an honest review. What worked? What did not? And what must be done differently this time?
Originally published by Vanguard. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.