DistantNews
Support us
Insurer denies compensation for ski helmet damaged during trip, citing minor visible flaws
๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ป Latvia /Culture & Society

Insurer denies compensation for ski helmet damaged during trip, citing minor visible flaws

From Delfi Latvia · () Latvian

Translated from Latvian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Sources not specified Context piece
  • A Latvian resident's ski helmet was damaged when it fell from a car in Italy.
  • The insurance company denied compensation, citing only minor visible damage.
  • The owner argues the helmet is unsafe after one impact, as per manufacturer guidelines, but the insurer requires a formal defect report.

A Latvian resident faces a dispute with his insurer, Swedbank, over a damaged ski helmet. The incident occurred in Italy when the helmet fell from his car onto asphalt after the door was opened. While the owner believes the helmet is no longer safe for use due to the impact, the insurance company has denied his claim.

When opening the car door, the helmet fell out, it fell on the asphalt, and this was reported to the insurers.

โ€” Anonymous ownerThe owner described how the ski helmet fell from his car.

The owner cited manufacturer recommendations, which state that a helmet should be replaced after a single impact, even if no external damage is visible. He presented this argument to Swedbank, but the insurer maintained that the visible damage was only cosmetic and did not affect the helmet's intended use.

I explained it to them, and they sent me another decision, stating the correct rules, but still negative with the same reasoning.

โ€” Anonymous ownerThe owner expressed frustration with the insurance company's repeated denial of his claim.

Swedbank's media relations manager, Jฤnis Krops, explained that the decision was based on the submitted materials, which did not show significant damage rendering the helmet unsafe. Krops expressed surprise that a helmet designed for substantial impacts would be considered irreparable from such a minor fall.

Compensation was denied to the client because the materials submitted in the application did not show anything that proves the helmet's damage to the extent that it would no longer be safe to use.

โ€” Jฤnis KropsSwedbank's media relations manager explained the basis for denying the claim.

However, Krops clarified that such assessments cannot be made solely from photographs of minor scratches. He urged the client to provide a formal defect report or a document confirming the helmet's unsafety, which Swedbank would then consider. Without such official documentation, the insurer stands by its decision.

It is slightly confusing that a helmet, whose purpose is to withstand significantly greater impact, would be irreparably damaged by practically slipping out of hand while sitting. However, regardless, such decisions cannot be made based on a single photograph showing only helmet scratches.

โ€” Jฤnis KropsKrops commented on the perceived discrepancy between the helmet's purpose and the incident.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Delfi Latvia in Latvian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.