DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea /Economy & Trade

Iran signals intent to charge fees for Strait of Hormuz passage after 60-day grace period

From Hankyoreh · () Korean

Translated from Korean, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News From a news agency Context piece
  • Iran's Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf stated that free passage through the Strait of Hormuz is only guaranteed for 60 days under a post-war agreement with the US.
  • He asserted Iran's sovereign control over the strait, suggesting that after the grace period, transit fees would be collected for services related to maritime security.
  • This stance positions the potential collection of fees as a key issue for upcoming negotiations between Iran and the US, with Oman reportedly considering a similar proposal for service charges.

Iran's Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf has declared that the free passage of ships through the Strait of Hormuz will only be permitted for 60 days, coinciding with the duration of a post-war memorandum of understanding with the United States. Beyond this period, Iran intends to levy fees for passage, asserting its sovereign rights over the crucial waterway.

Under the post-war memorandum of understanding, free passage through the Strait of Hormuz is only allowed for 60 days.

โ€” Mohammad Bagher GhalibafIran's Parliament Speaker stating the limited duration of free passage through the Strait of Hormuz.

Ghalibaf emphasized the strategic importance of the Strait of Hormuz, describing it as a "gift from God" and Iran's "greatest tool of power." He indicated that the value of the strait increases with traffic, not decreases, signaling a firm intention to manage and potentially profit from its use. This statement directly challenges the US position, which advocates for continued free passage without additional charges.

The 60-day free transit period stems from a memorandum of understanding signed between the US and Iran on the 17th of last month. This agreement also stipulates that Iran and Oman will discuss long-term management and maritime service plans for the strait. While the US insists on maintaining the principle of free navigation, Iran argues for compensation for services such as ensuring navigational safety.

Our management and sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz are definitive and clear. We will establish its security in the best possible way.

โ€” Mohammad Bagher GhalibafAsserting Iran's control and commitment to security in the Strait of Hormuz.

Oman appears to be aligning with Iran's perspective, reportedly proposing a plan to its allies and the US that would involve shipping companies paying service fees for using the strait. Although not explicitly termed 'transit fees,' these charges would effectively establish a mandatory cost for passage. Ghalibaf confirmed that agreements on legal and service-related matters have been reached with Oman, with further discussions planned within 30 days.

The Strait of Hormuz was a gift from God to us in this war, and it is our greatest tool of power. We will properly protect this grace of God.

โ€” Mohammad Bagher GhalibafDescribing the strategic and symbolic importance of the Strait of Hormuz to Iran.

The issue of transit fees is expected to be a central point in future negotiations between the US and Iran, potentially in Doha, Qatar. The White House has reiterated former President Donald Trump's stance that Iran cannot impose fees on the strait, which is considered an international waterway. The differing interpretations and intentions surrounding the Strait of Hormuz's future management highlight a significant point of contention between the two nations.

The strait is valuable not when traffic decreases, but when it increases every day.

โ€” Mohammad Bagher GhalibafIndicating Iran's view on the economic and strategic value of the Strait of Hormuz.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Hankyoreh in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.