DistantNews
Support us

Iraq’s Coordination Framework and armed factions hit deadlock in talks

From Asharq Al-Awsat · () English

Translated from English and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.

At a glance

News Named sources Ongoing story
  • Iraq’s Shiite Coordination Framework has failed to persuade armed factions to surrender their weapons as the Sept. 30 deadline for the final U.S. withdrawal approaches.
  • Groups including Kataib Hezbollah and Harakat al-Nujaba reject a fixed timetable, saying their weapons are ideological and not limited to Iraq’s borders.
  • The standoff threatens government plans to mark the U.S. departure and transfer of factional weapons to state control as “Sovereignty Day.”

Talks between Iraq’s Shiite Coordination Framework and armed factions have reached an impasse, with the Sept. 30 deadline for the final U.S. withdrawal approaching. The deadlock has cast doubt on government plans to celebrate the date as “Sovereignty Day.”

A three-member committee formed by the Framework has so far failed to secure a breakthrough. The government of Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi had hoped Sept. 30 would mark both the departure of U.S. forces and the transfer of factional weapons to government control. The armed groups now reject demands to hand over their arsenals by that date.

preserving the Popular Mobilization Forces as a national body that cannot be compromised

· Ali al-AsadiThe Harakat al-Nujaba political council chief reaffirmed the group’s position after meetings with figures in the Coordination Framework.

Harakat al-Nujaba, along with former Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and Badr Organization leader Hadi al-Amiri, has said there is no final or fixed deadline for handing over, restricting, disarming or freezing weapons held outside state control. Kataib Hezbollah and Harakat al-Nujaba have previously rejected any timetable, saying their weapons are ideological and not confined within national borders.

Ali al-Asadi, head of Harakat al-Nujaba’s Political Council, said the movement would defend what he called the “sanctity” of the resistance’s weapons against regional risks and threats. In a post on X, he said he had met leading figures in the Framework’s political process and reaffirmed the importance of preserving the Popular Mobilization Forces as a national body that could not be compromised.

This approach is what keeps us alongside our people, experiencing what they experience, carrying their concerns and working to fulfill their demands.

· Ali al-AsadiHe explained why Harakat al-Nujaba would not participate in the political process.

Asadi also repeated Nujaba’s refusal to participate in the political process. “This approach is what keeps us alongside our people, experiencing what they experience, carrying their concerns and working to fulfill their demands,” he said. He added that the responsibility would continue until comprehensive change secured sovereignty, security and prosperity, freed the economy from American domination and stabilized Iraq’s domestic situation.

The government has responded through Sabah al-Numan, spokesperson for the commander-in-chief of the armed forces. He said no force or regional circumstance could break a state whose people rallied around its institutions, and warned of what he called alarmism from platforms financed with suspicious funds as the deadline approaches.

No force in the world and no regional circumstances can break a state whose people, in all their components and communities, rally around its institutions.

· Sabah al-NumanThe Iraqi government spokesperson defended state institutions as the withdrawal deadline approached.
About this summary

Originally published by Asharq Al-Awsat in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.