DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฉ Bangladesh /Culture & Society

Journalism cannot be neutral in unequal society, says editors' council chief

From Daily Star · () English

Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Context piece
  • Editors' Council President Nurul Kabir argued that journalism cannot be neutral in an unequal society, stating its primary duty is to hold power accountable.
  • He urged the government to repeal laws restricting press freedom, citing a 1973 law requiring publications to not act against government interests.
  • Information Minister Zahir Uddin Swapon emphasized factual accuracy and objectivity, warning that advocacy can distort reporting, and announced plans for a media commission.

Journalism's foremost duty is to serve the public interest by holding those in power accountable, especially in an unequal society where neutrality is impossible, according to Editors' Council President Nurul Kabir. Speaking at a seminar at the University of Dhaka, the New Age editor urged the government to repeal laws that continue to restrict press freedom more than five decades after Bangladesh's independence.

If society is divided into different classes and injustice exists, how can journalism, or any intellectual activity, remain neutral?

โ€” Nurul KabirQuestioning the possibility of neutrality in journalism within an unequal society.

Kabir questioned the concept of "neutral journalism," stating that neutrality in a society marked by class divisions and injustice merely preserves the status quo. He argued that journalism's first responsibility is to present truthful information but must also interpret facts from the perspective of public interest, enabling citizens to form informed opinions about the political, economic, and cultural order. He described journalism as a "political intellectual activity" committed to democracy and public interest.

The editor also criticized media laws that he believes constrain press freedom. He specifically referred to a 1973 publication licensing law that requires publishers to undertake that their publications will not act against the government's interests, calling the provision inconsistent with democratic principles. "If an elected government acts against public interest, writing against it is not only the people's fundamental right but can also be their responsibility," he asserted, urging the minister to repeal the provision.

If an elected government acts against public interest, writing against it is not only the people's fundamental right but can also be their responsibility.

โ€” Nurul KabirArguing for the right and responsibility to criticize a government acting against public interest.

Responding to Kabir's address, Information and Broadcasting Minister Zahir Uddin Swapon acknowledged journalism as an indispensable pillar of modern democracy. However, he stressed that factual accuracy and objectivity must precede any broader public-interest mission. Swapon warned that advocacy could distort reporting if objectivity is compromised. He also stated that the government is collaborating with media owners, editors, and journalists to establish a media commission aimed at strengthening professional standards, improving journalists' safety, and addressing issues related to media freedom. The seminar was organized by the Department of Mass Communication and Journalism to mark its 64th founding anniversary.

Advocacy could distort reporting if objectivity was compromised.

โ€” Zahir Uddin SwaponWarning about the potential negative impact of advocacy on journalistic objectivity.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Daily Star in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.