Let's Build a 'Pragmatic Two-State' Relationship Between North and South

North Korea has officially abandoned its long-held pursuit of national unity and cooperation, instead enshrining a 'hostile two-state theory' in its party charter. This declaration, made by Kim Jong Un, signifies a fundamental shift in inter-Korean relations, moving away from the rhetoric of a shared nation towards a framework of two distinct and potentially adversarial states.

“

North Korea has never refused peace... Whether our adversaries choose confrontation or peaceful coexistence is their choice, and we are prepared to respond to any choice.

However, this article from Hankyoreh argues that even within this new framework of two states, cooperation is still possible and, indeed, necessary. The author proposes a 'pragmatic two-state theory' that moves beyond the 'hostile' framing to one of 'pragmatic coexistence.' This approach recognizes the reality of two sovereign states, each with its own constitution and governing system, and suggests that cooperation can be built on mutual economic interests, much like how independent nations interact on the global stage.

“

North Korea no longer speaks of unification. In February, North Korea enshrined the 'hostile two-state theory' in its party charter.

The article draws a parallel to the historical examples of nations transitioning from hostility to cooperation or competition, emphasizing that hostility is a choice, not a fixed destiny. It critiques the structural limitations of a confrontational stance, citing the example of East Germany's isolation leading to internal pressure for change. The author suggests that while North Korea's focus may be on the United States, South Korea can still play an active role by proposing a new model of inter-Korean relations based on shared benefits, such as restarting economic cooperation projects like the Kaesong Industrial Complex and Mount Kumgang tourism.

“

Two states existing does not necessarily mean hostility. There are countless historical examples of transitions from hostility to cooperation, and from cooperation to competition.

From a South Korean perspective, this shift by North Korea presents both a challenge and an opportunity. While the 'hostile two-state theory' might seem alarming, the article frames it as a potential opening for a more pragmatic and interest-based relationship. The key lies in South Korea's ability to proactively offer a blueprint for cooperation that benefits both sides, thereby reasserting its agency in inter-Korean affairs and moving beyond a passive observer role, especially as major powers like the US recalibrate their foreign policy.

“

Hostility is not a fixed destiny; it is the result of a choice. Kim Jong Un chose hostility in that choice. We can choose cooperation on the same reality.