Liberals Defy PLRA Directive and Vote to Reappoint Camilo Benítez
Translated from Spanish and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.
At a glance
- Fourteen lawmakers from Paraguay’s PLRA voted to re-elect Camilo Benítez as comptroller general despite a party directive opposing what it called the government’s takeover of the office.
- The lawmakers included members of the Nuevo Liberalismo movement led by Central Governor and presidential hopeful Ricardo Estigarribia.
- PLRA leader Alcides Riveros denied issuing a specific voting instruction and said the party’s conduct tribunal could consider sanctions if a dispute arose.
Fourteen lawmakers from Paraguay’s Liberal Party, the PLRA, voted with the Cartes movement to give Camilo Benítez another term as comptroller general. Their decision went against the party directorate, which had urged legislators and the wider opposition not to legitimize what it described as the officialist takeover of the institution.
The lawmakers included several politicians with relatives serving as mayors in their local strongholds. Members of Nuevo Liberalismo, a movement led by Central Governor and presidential hopeful Ricardo Estigarribia, also supported Benítez’s re-election.
The PLRA directorate, chaired by Alcides Riveros, had called for the opposition to retain the comptroller and deputy comptroller posts. It also urged candidates linked to opposition electoral forces to withdraw rather than legitimize the process. The resolution assigned Riveros to communicate that position to Liberal lawmakers in both chambers.
We instructed members of the Authentic Radical Liberal Party that they could resign if the shortlist was not made up of the Paraguayan opposition.
Riveros rejected the suggestion that the 14 deputies had ignored the directorate. “We instructed members of the Authentic Radical Liberal Party that they could resign if the shortlist was not made up of the Paraguayan opposition,” he said.
He argued that the directorate’s resolution did not order legislators to take a particular vote. Riveros added that the PLRA’s new conduct tribunal could examine a possible sanction or other measure if a dispute developed. “It does not say that, the resolution is clear,” he said.
It does not say that, the resolution is clear.
Originally published by ABC Color in Spanish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.