DistantNews
Support us
Man convicted on appeal for installing camera, recording conversations in ex-brother-in-law's home
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea /Crime & Justice

Man convicted on appeal for installing camera, recording conversations in ex-brother-in-law's home

From Dong-A Ilbo · () Korean

Translated from Korean, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Outcome reported
  • A man accused of installing a home camera in his ex-brother-in-law's home and recording conversations has been found guilty on appeal.
  • The appeals court overturned a lower court's acquittal, sentencing him to a suspended prison term.
  • The former father-in-law, also accused, was acquitted in both trials.

A South Korean appeals court has convicted a man of illegally recording conversations by installing a home camera in the home of his former brother-in-law, the son of baseball manager Ryu Joong-il. The Seoul High Court overturned the initial acquittal, sentencing the man, identified as Park, to one year in prison, suspended for two years, and ordering 120 hours of community service.

The court found that Park had intentionally activated the recording function on the home camera, negating the defense's claim that the primary purpose was video recording. The judges stated that under the relevant law, the intention to record does not require it to be the sole or primary purpose.

Given that the home camera with a recording function was installed and the automatic recording function was activated, the intent to record cannot be denied.

โ€” CourtThe appeals court explaining its reasoning for convicting the former brother-in-law.

Meanwhile, Park's father, who was also charged in connection with the incident, was acquitted in the first trial and his acquittal was upheld by the appeals court. The case involved the installation of a hidden camera in the home of Ryu's son and daughter-in-law, who had recently separated.

Even if the main purpose was video recording, the intent for recording is not required to be the main purpose under the Telecommunications Privacy Protection Act.

โ€” CourtFurther justification from the court regarding the legal interpretation of the violation.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Dong-A Ilbo in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.