DistantNews
Support us

Man in live-in relationship 'in nature of marriage’ can be prosecuted for cruelty towards woman: SC

From Hindustan Times · () English

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Approved/passed
  • India's Supreme Court ruled that men in live-in relationships akin to marriage can be prosecuted for cruelty.
  • The court stated that excluding women in such relationships from legal protection would be discriminatory.
  • This ruling extends the reach of Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code to qualifying live-in relationships, provided intent to marry can be established.

India's Supreme Court has ruled that men involved in live-in relationships that mirror the nature of marriage can face prosecution for cruelty against their female partners. The court emphasized that denying legal recourse to women in such unions solely because they lack a formal marriage certificate would constitute discriminatory treatment.

This landmark decision marks the first authoritative interpretation extending the penal provision, specifically Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), to qualifying live-in relationships. The bench, comprising justices Sanjay Karol and N Kotiswar Singh, held that the law's intent is to combat domestic cruelty, which can manifest regardless of marital status.

The same evil of domestic cruelty can manifest regardless of whether the woman has a formal marriage certificate or is in a relationship that bears all the essential characteristics of marriage.

— Supreme Court benchThe court explained its reasoning for extending the penal provision to live-in relationships, emphasizing the need to address domestic cruelty irrespective of formal marital status.

The court clarified that this protection is not universal for all romantic or casual cohabitation arrangements. It applies only to relationships that meet a judicially established test of being "in the nature of marriage," with evidence indicating both parties intended to marry. The woman seeking to invoke the provision bears the initial burden of proving this intent.

The judgment arose from an appeal concerning criminal proceedings in Karnataka, where the accused challenged the charges on the grounds of not being formally married. The court's verdict underscored a purposive interpretation of the penal statute, prioritizing its social objective over a rigid, literal reading. This approach aims to prevent the law from being frustrated by technicalities and creating arbitrary distinctions between similarly situated women.

The law must be interpreted in a manner that advances its social purpose rather than defeats it.

— Supreme Court benchThe court highlighted its approach to statutory interpretation, favoring a purposive construction to achieve the law's intended social objectives.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Hindustan Times. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.