DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง United Kingdom /Technology

Meta ditches AI image tool after privacy backlash

From The Guardian · () English

Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Sources not specified Outcome reported
  • Meta is discontinuing its Muse Image AI feature, which generated images from public Instagram posts, after facing significant criticism over privacy concerns.
  • The feature was criticized for being an automatic opt-in and for potential misuse of user data.
  • SAG-AFTRA and other critics welcomed Meta's decision, emphasizing the need for clear user consent in AI applications.

Meta has decided to discontinue its new AI image generation feature, Muse Image, just days after its launch. The feature, integrated into Meta's AI chatbot, allowed users to create images based on public Instagram content. However, it quickly drew widespread criticism, particularly concerning user privacy.

Our intent was to provide a useful creative tool and to give people control over whether their public content could be referenced in this way.

โ€” MetaThe company stated its original intention behind the Muse Image AI feature.

The backlash intensified with comments from figures like Emmy-winning actor Hannah Einbinder, who highlighted that the feature was automatically enabled for users. SAG-AFTRA, the union representing actors and media professionals, also urged its members and other Instagram users to opt out, deeming the automatic opt-in unacceptable and a miscalculation of public sentiment regarding the risks of such AI applications.

Weโ€™ve heard the feedback that this feature missed the mark, so itโ€™s no longer available.

โ€” MetaMeta announced its decision to discontinue the Muse Image AI feature.

Meta acknowledged the feedback, stating, "Weโ€™ve heard the feedback that this feature missed the mark, so itโ€™s no longer available." The company had initially intended the feature to be a creative tool, giving users control over whether their public content could be referenced. However, the automatic opt-in mechanism and the broader privacy implications overshadowed this intent.

Anything other than a clear and conspicuous opt-in for these types of uses of Instagram usersโ€™ images is unacceptable, and an utter miscalculation of public sentiment regarding the obvious dangers and harms inherent in such use.

โ€” SAG-AFTRAThe union criticized Meta's automatic opt-in approach for the AI feature.

Following Meta's announcement to remove the feature, SAG-AFTRA expressed its approval. A union spokesperson stated, "With the dangers of nonconsensual digital replicas well known to all, a feature that encouraged that behavior is unwise. We appreciate its discontinuance. It is the responsible thing to do." This reversal underscores the growing pressure on technology companies to provide transparent and explicit user control over how their data is utilized by AI technologies.

With the dangers of nonconsensual digital replicas well known to all, a feature that encouraged that behavior is unwise. We appreciate its discontinuance. It is the responsible thing to do.

โ€” SAG-AFTRAA union spokesperson commented on Meta's decision to remove the AI feature.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by The Guardian in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.