Mexico City Lawmaker Proposes Post-Separation Pet Pensions

A local legislator in Mexico City is proposing new regulations to ensure the welfare of pets when couples separate or divorce. Luisa Ledesma, a deputy from Movimiento Ciudadano, argues that a legal gap exists regarding the financial responsibility for companion animals after a relationship ends.

Ledesma presented an initiative to modify the local Civil Code, aiming to establish a system for pet maintenance. The proposal frames pets as sentient beings and asserts that individuals who voluntarily share responsibility for their care remain co-responsible for their integral well-being, regardless of relationship status changes like separation, divorce, or the end of a common-law partnership.

“

The person obligated to contribute to the maintenance of the companion animal fulfills their obligation through the direct exercise of its care and the satisfaction of the needs inherent to its integral well-being, or through the provision of a pension intended to cover its maintenance.

The proposed maintenance includes all necessities for a pet's integral well-being, such as food, shelter, veterinary care, medication, rehabilitation, and other essential needs tailored to the animal's species, age, health, and specific conditions. The initiative suggests that financial contributions can be made directly through care or via a pension payment.

In cases of dispute over how maintenance should be provided, the proposal states that a judge will determine the method, always prioritizing the animal's best interest. The amount of support will be based on the pet's needs and the financial capacity of the responsible parties. Ledesma referenced the existing "Who Gets the Dog?" law, which addresses custody dilemmas, and seeks to build upon it by establishing clear rules for the ongoing financial support required for animals' welfare.

“

In case of conflict regarding the form of providing maintenance, it corresponds to the judge to set it, according to the circumstances of the case, always prioritizing the superior interest of the sentient being.