Most Hungarians back Magyar’s plan for a new constitution, poll finds
Translated from Polish and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.
At a glance
- Sixty-one percent of Hungarians support adopting a new constitution, while 24% favor keeping the current one, according to a Publicus poll.
- Prime Minister Peter Magyar’s government has said it will begin constitutional reform in the autumn and could hold a referendum next summer.
- The poll also measured views on the government’s use of its two-thirds parliamentary majority and on President András Baka.
Peter Magyar’s plans to rebuild Hungary’s state institutions have won majority support, according to a new Publicus poll. Sixty-one percent of respondents said they favored adopting a new constitution, while 24 percent wanted to retain the current basic law.
The result gives Magyar’s government political room to pursue a constitutional referendum, which the prime minister said in June could take place next summer. His cabinet plans to begin the constitutional reform process in the autumn.
The survey also examined whether the Tisza party should use all available legal means to dismantle the system created by former Prime Minister Viktor Orbán. Twenty-seven percent said such action would be permissible, while the same share said the current government’s use of its two-thirds parliamentary majority was unacceptable. Thirty-six percent considered Magyar’s actions justified, but said the government should exercise particular caution and use its powers only to improve public life.
Respondents also assessed President András Baka, appointed with the support of the Tisza majority after Tamás Sulyok was removed from office. Fifty percent considered Baka suitable for the presidency, 20 percent said he was unsuitable and 30 percent had no opinion.
Publicus conducted the telephone survey from Aug. 18 to 25, 2026, among 1,006 people.
Originally published by Rzeczpospolita in Polish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.