Nigeria's Religious Funding Allocation Sparks Outrage

Nigeria's government faces criticism for its continued funding of religious activities, a practice many argue contradicts the nation's constitutional status as a secular state. The latest controversy surrounds a ₦8.05 billion allocation in the 2026 budget earmarked for the construction, renovation, and equipping of places of worship across the country.

Tracka, a public accountability organization under BudgIT, revealed the budget breakdown, showing ₦6.14 billion designated for 52 mosque projects and ₦1.91 billion for projects tied to seven churches. This significant public expenditure on religious infrastructure has ignited public outrage, with many questioning the government's priorities.

“

The questions to pose to him are: Are government resources supposed to be allocated to churches and Mosques? Why can’t the adherents of the different religions conduct their sensitization at their own expense? Is Nigeria no longer a secular state? How much was allocated to traditional religion for the fortification of their shrines and engagement of young traditional religion’s worshippers?

In defense of the allocations, the office of the Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives, Benjamin Kalu, clarified that a proposed ₦1 billion for musical instruments for churches in his constituency was actually ₦780 million after deductions. He stated the program aims to support over 130 churches, with each receiving between ₦5 million and ₦6 million to strengthen their capacity for youth engagement through character development and moral instruction.

“

In a failed attempt to defend part of the money allocated to his constituency, the Office of the Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives, Benjamin Kalu, faulted the reports that N1billion was allocated for the procurement of musical instruments for churches in the Bende Federal Constituency of Abia State, which he represents.

However, critics question the fundamental premise of government funding for religious institutions. They ask whether public resources should be allocated to churches and mosques, suggesting that religious adherents should fund these activities themselves. The debate also raises questions about Nigeria's secular identity and the lack of allocation for traditional religious practices.

Many view these allocations as a misdirection of funds that could otherwise be used for critical infrastructure development and other public services. The practice highlights concerns about governance priorities and the potential for mismanagement of public resources, turning governance into what some describe as an "unserious business and a huge joke."

“

This is how officials of the Nigerian government divert and mismanage monies that are supposed to be used for the development of basic infrastructure.