DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฉ Bangladesh /Crime & Justice

[object Object]

From Daily Star · () English

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources In the courts
  • Four individuals convicted in the killing of student Abu Sayed have appealed their sentences at the Supreme Court.
  • The convicts include two former police officers sentenced to death and two others who received prison terms.
  • The appeals argue the clients' innocence due to a lack of proper evidence.

Four individuals convicted in the killing of student Abu Sayed have filed appeals with the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, seeking acquittal. The appeals challenge the convictions related to the shooting death of Abu Sayed, a student at Begum Rokeya University (BRUR), who was killed by police on July 16, 2024, during the July Uprising in front of the university.

The convicts submitting appeals are former Rangpur Metropolitan Police Assistant Sub-Inspector Amir Hossain and Constable Sujan Chandra Roy, who were both sentenced to death. Also appealing are former BRUR Assistant Registrar Rafiul Hasan Russell and Bangladesh Chhatra League joint general secretary Emran Chowdhury, known as Akash, who received five-year prison sentences. Their lawyer, Azizur Rahman Dulu, confirmed the filings.

All four appellants are currently in jail.

โ€” Azizur Rahman DuluThe lawyer confirmed the current status of the individuals appealing their convictions.

Earlier, on April 9, the International Crimes Tribunal-2 had handed down sentences to 29 individuals. Among them, Amir and Sujan received death sentences, while Rafiul and Emran were sentenced to five years' imprisonment. The remaining 25 individuals received varying jail terms. Amir and Sujan filed one appeal, while Rafiul and Emran filed a separate one. All four appellants are currently incarcerated.

Lawyer Azizur Rahman Dulu stated that his clients maintain their innocence, arguing that the evidence presented against them was insufficient. The Supreme Court is expected to schedule a date for hearing these appeals.

my clients are innocent and argued there is no proper evidence against them.

โ€” Azizur Rahman DuluThe lawyer cited the appeals, claiming his clients' innocence due to a lack of sufficient evidence.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Daily Star. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.