DistantNews
Support us
PDIP Backs State Policy Guidelines, Rejects Constitutional Amendment
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Indonesia /Elections & Politics

PDIP Backs State Policy Guidelines, Rejects Constitutional Amendment

From CNN Indonesia · () Indonesian

Translated from Indonesian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News From a news agency New plan
  • PDIP acknowledges supporting the State Policy Guidelines (PPHN) but opposes amending the constitution.
  • The party advocates for continuity in government programs across administrations.
  • PDIP's stance contrasts with the strongest option being considered by the MPR, which is a constitutional amendment.

The Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDIP) has confirmed its support for the State Policy Guidelines (PPHN), a framework whose discussion has concluded and is ready for the next legislative stage. PDIP's Deputy Secretary-General, Utut Adianto, stated that his party was a key proponent of the PPHN, aiming to ensure program continuity regardless of changes in government leadership.

PPHN was indeed one of our main drivers. The concept is that state policy should not be interrupted by presidential changes.

โ€” Utut AdiantoExplaining PDIP's support for the State Policy Guidelines.

"PPHN was indeed one of our main drivers. The concept is that state policy should not be interrupted by presidential changes," Adianto explained at the parliamentary complex on Friday. However, PDIP rejects the option of enacting the PPHN through an amendment to the 1945 Constitution, though Adianto did not elaborate on the specific reasons for this opposition.

If we support it clearly, we will guard it, no need for amendments.

โ€” Utut AdiantoStating PDIP's opposition to constitutional amendment for PPHN.

Currently, the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR) is considering three options for regulating the PPHN: amending the constitution, passing a law, or issuing a decree (TAP MPR). The constitutional amendment option is reportedly the strongest contender. MPR Deputy Speaker Eddy Soeparno indicated that amendments and TAP MPR are the most seriously considered, while a law is seen as weaker due to potential legal challenges and ease of revision by future administrations.

The Democrats believe that the establishment of PPHN does not require constitutional changes.

โ€” Benny Kabur HarmanOutlining the Democratic Party's stance on PPHN regulation.

The Democratic Party also opposes amending the constitution for the PPHN. Party member Benny Kabur Harman proposed that the PPHN could be adequately regulated through a TAP MPR. "The Democrats believe that the establishment of PPHN does not require constitutional changes," Harman stated, adding that a TAP MPR would suffice.

If it is to be formed, PPHN can be formed in a TAP MPR.

โ€” Benny Kabur HarmanSuggesting TAP MPR as the appropriate legal instrument for PPHN.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by CNN Indonesia in Indonesian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.