DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea /Elections & Politics

President Lee: 'Never held Korea Military Academy responsible for three coups... unify academies swiftly'

From Hankyoreh · () Korean

Translated from Korean, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Official statement New plan
  • President Lee Jae-myung stated that the Korea Military Academy has never been held responsible for past military coups.
  • He argued that merging the military academies into a unified institution would structurally reduce the possibility of future coups.
  • The president urged the Ministry of National Defense to swiftly and decisively establish a unified military academy.

President Lee Jae-myung asserted that the Korea Military Academy has never faced accountability for its central role in three past military coups, despite South Korea's advancement into a developed nation. He argued that merging the separate military academies, Army, Navy, and Air Force, into a single, unified institution is essential to prevent future military insurrections.

How many military coups have there been in South Korea? The Korea Military Academy was at the center of three coups, yet it has never been held responsible.

โ€” President Lee Jae-myungPresident Lee Jae-myung questioned the lack of accountability for the Korea Military Academy regarding past military coups.

During a defense ministry briefing, President Lee highlighted historical instances where graduates of the Army-centric academy were instrumental in coups. He cited the 1961 May 16 coup led by Army graduates, the 1979 December 12 coup involving Army graduates, and a recent internal disturbance in 2024 involving current and former Army generals. Lee questioned the notion that Army generals, who have previously supported such actions, would not do so again, emphasizing the need for structural safeguards.

Who would have thought that Army generals would conspire to stage a military coup in a country the world sees as developed? We must prevent this, structurally.

โ€” President Lee Jae-myungPresident Lee emphasized the need for structural changes to prevent military coups, even in a developed nation.

"How can we allow a situation where a specific branch's officers overwhelmingly dominate the military, occasionally staging coups that cripple the nation, and then face no consequences?" Lee asked, suggesting that a unified academy would dilute the influence of any single service branch and lessen the potential for such power grabs. He stressed that while most soldiers are loyal, the opportunity and incentive for a few to commit "unforgivable acts" must be eliminated through a rational educational system.

Can we allow a situation where officers from a specific branch overwhelmingly dominate the military, occasionally staging coups that cripple the nation, and then face no consequences?

โ€” President Lee Jae-myungThe president highlighted the potential for abuse of power within a single service branch and advocated for unification.

President Lee's remarks directly challenge the Ministry of National Defense's previous explanations for establishing a unified academy. The ministry had previously stated the initiative was aimed at enhancing joint operations and preparing for future warfare, such as artificial intelligence and drone technology, distancing it from any connection to the recent internal disturbance involving Army figures. Lee's framing of the unification as a measure to prevent coups and hold the Army accountable introduces a politically charged dimension to the reform, potentially sparking debate about its true motivations.

It's not necessarily because people are bad, but because they act when given the opportunity and incentive. We absolutely need a rational educational system that prevents this.

โ€” President Lee Jae-myungPresident Lee attributed the possibility of coups to systemic factors rather than solely individual malice, calling for a robust educational framework.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Hankyoreh in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.