Prince Harry and others lose High Court case against Daily Mail publisher

A High Court judge has dismissed the claims brought by Prince Harry, Elton John, Baroness Doreen Lawrence, and four other public figures against Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL), the publisher of the Daily Mail. The group alleged that private investigators, freelance journalists, and ANL staff engaged in unlawful information gathering. Their claims included acts such as voicemail interception, landline tapping, and obtaining information through deception, commonly known as "blagging." ANL strongly denied the allegations and defended the cases, arguing they were filed too late. In his ruling, Mr Justice Nicklin stated that none of the seven claimants had proven their allegations of unlawful information gathering. He declared, "For the reasons given in this judgment, each of the claimants’ claims is dismissed." The trial involved evidence from numerous individuals, including Prince Harry, Liz Hurley, Sadie Frost, Simon Hughes, and many current or former ANL journalists and executives. During his cross-examination in January, Prince Harry suggested he could not complain about some of the 14 articles in his case at the time due to "the institution I was in." He also stated in written evidence that "knowingly false" information was added to stories to mislead him and conceal unlawful methods, such as voicemail interception. ANL's defense presented what it called a "compelling account of a pattern of legitimate sourcing of articles." This included information from friends, "leaky" social circles, press officers, spokespersons, previous reporting, freelance journalists, and other newspapers and news agencies. The court also considered arguments regarding the timeliness of the lawsuits, as laws typically require legal action related to unlawful information gathering to be initiated within six years of a claimant discovering their potential claim.

“

For the reasons given in this judgment, each of the claimants’ claims is dismissed.