RDX procurement exposed: Timeline reveals legislator first posted 'Indian explosives'
Translated from Chinese, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Taiwan's National Defense Ministry is accused of misrepresenting the timeline of an RDX explosive procurement, with a legislator allegedly revealing the source country first.
- Legislator Ma Wen-chun is accused of exposing India as the source of RDX raw materials before the manufacturer officially disclosed it, leading to procurement issues.
- Critics argue Ma Wen-chun and her party are attempting to shift blame and distort facts regarding the sensitive national security information.
Taiwan's National Defense Ministry faces accusations of manipulating the timeline surrounding the procurement of RDX explosive raw materials, with a legislator allegedly being the first to reveal India as the source country. This revelation has reportedly led to the procurement's failure, a situation described as "seeing the light of day and dying" (่ฆๅ ๆญป).
Legislator Ma Wen-chun of the Kuomintang party is accused by informed sources of exposing India as the origin of the RDX raw materials in a social media post and press conference before the manufacturer officially disclosed this information. The sources claim that the bid award announcement on December 10 did not specify the country of origin, but Ma Wen-chun's Facebook post on December 11, complete with an image labeled "Indian explosives," was the earliest public disclosure of the source.
According to the timeline provided by informed sources, Ma Wen-chun and fellow legislators held a press conference on December 12 questioning the manufacturer, Fomax. Three days later, on December 14, Fomax issued a statement clarifying that only China and India have RDX production capabilities, reportedly to protect its reputation and respond to accusations about the procurement's source shifting between the US and India. Ma Wen-chun then scheduled a special report at the Legislative Yuan's Foreign and National Defense Committee on December 15, inquiring about potential impacts on Indian exports.
Critics accuse Ma Wen-chun and her party of fabricating a narrative, claiming the manufacturer "voluntarily disclosed" the information and that the bid was awarded before her questioning. They argue that Ma Wen-chun's actions, including exposing sensitive national security information for political gain and then distorting the timeline to cover up the facts, are inappropriate for a legislator. The situation is seen as detrimental to national security and the public interest.
Originally published by Liberty Times in Chinese. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.