Rival Party Leaders Meet, Agree to Regular Dialogue Amid Policy Clashes

Democratic Party leader Kim Min-seok praised his counterpart, People Power Party leader Jang Dong-hyuk, calling him an "essential leader" and a figure with a "warm smile." The meeting, held at the National Assembly, marked a significant moment as it was the first time a People Power Party leader visited the Democratic Party leader's office in a year.

“

I actually like Jang. I think he is an essential leader in some sense. He is the leader of the main opposition party with stable support from party members, and a leader with good character who always gives me a warm smile.

Kim proposed regularizing meetings between the party leaders, suggesting a desire to maintain an "unbroken bridge of conversation." He emphasized the importance of continuous dialogue between the leaders of the two largest parties, especially given their proximity within the National Assembly. Jang expressed agreement, acknowledging the need for more frequent, informal discussions beyond official, televised events.

“

I largely agree. The distance between the leaders' offices is not that far. It's not a long distance, but there hasn't been dialogue between the two of us. I strongly agree with the proposal to meet frequently rather than having dialogue in official settings in front of broadcast cameras.

However, the meeting was not without friction. The leaders clashed over the Supreme Court's process for recommending Supreme Court justices, with Kim suggesting that while procedural issues may have existed, the situation now requires a comprehensive normalization. Jang, conversely, urged against overemphasizing procedural matters. They also exchanged views on fiscal policy, with Kim proposing that at least 50% of new tax revenue be allocated to support the middle class, the poor, and young people. Jang, meanwhile, called for a consistent approach to housing policy and urged the government to be decisive in changing course if policies are expected to have negative consequences.

“

It seems like your point is that there were procedural issues while requesting a political decision. In a situation 21 years later, we are approaching this from the perspective that all levels, including the overall procedures, should be normalized.