DistantNews
Support us
Sámi Parliament demands halt to Repparfjord operations after Supreme Court ruling

Sámi Parliament demands halt to Repparfjord operations after Supreme Court ruling

From Aftenposten · () Norwegian

Translated from Norwegian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources New plan
  • The Sámi Parliament urges the government to halt operations for depositing mining waste in Repparfjord, Finnmark.
  • This request follows a Supreme Court ruling that invalidated Nordic Mining's permit to deposit waste in Førdefjord.
  • The Sámi Parliament argues the permits for Førdefjord and Repparfjord are nearly identical and share the same temporal overlap, making the Repparfjord permit also invalid.

The Sámi Parliament is calling on the Norwegian government to intervene and stop the permission for depositing mining waste in Repparfjord, located in Finnmark.

This demand stems from a recent Supreme Court decision that declared Nordic Mining's permit for waste disposal in Førdefjord, Vestland, invalid. The Sámi Parliament contends that the permits for both Førdefjord and Repparfjord are contemporaneous and virtually identical. They assert that the same flaw leading to the invalidation of the Førdefjord permits also applies to the Repparfjord permit under the Pollution Control Act and the Minerals Act.

The error that led to the invalidation of the permits for deposition in Førdefjord and associated mineral operations also applies to the permit under the Pollution Control Act and the Minerals Act in Repparfjord.

— Sámi ParliamentThe Sámi Parliament's official letter to several ministries outlining their argument for halting Repparfjord operations.

However, Minister of Climate and Environment Andreas Bjelland Eriksen has rejected the notion that the cases are directly comparable. He stated that the Supreme Court ruling specifically pertains to the Engebø case and does not address potential emissions into Repparfjord. Eriksen added that the government will first assess how to proceed with the Engebø ruling and will address any implications for other cases if they arise.

The ruling concerns the Engebø case and does not address potential emissions into Repparfjord. We will first assess how to follow up on the ruling in the Engebø case. If we see that it has implications for other cases, we will follow up on that.

— Andreas Bjelland EriksenMinister of Climate and Environment responding to the Sámi Parliament's request.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Aftenposten in Norwegian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.