DistantNews
Support us
Saxony-Anhalt Election: How Campaigns and Donations Could Influence the Vote
🇩🇪 Germany /Elections & Politics

Saxony-Anhalt Election: How Campaigns and Donations Could Influence the Vote

From Die Zeit · () German

Translated from German and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.

At a glance

Analysis Named sources Ongoing story
  • Political organizations, celebrities, religious representatives and associations are urging specific voting choices or higher turnout in Saxony-Anhalt’s state election campaign.
  • Campact is spending 620,000 euros from private donations to encourage tactical second votes for the SPD and Greens as a way to prevent an AfD majority.
  • A political scientist says such campaigns can coordinate individual decisions, but the impact of earlier campaigns remains uncertain and the FDP says they interfere heavily in the election.

In Saxony-Anhalt’s state election campaign, voters are being urged not only to support parties but also to vote strategically against a possible AfD majority. The appeals come from political organizations, celebrities, religious representatives and associations, adding another layer to the contest.

Campact’s "Strategic Voting" campaign is urging voters to give their second votes to the SPD and Greens. The organization says it is investing 620,000 euros, funded by private donations. Political scientist and election researcher Thorsten Faas of Freie Universität Berlin said such campaigns can influence an outcome because they coordinate many individual decisions.

Newer are campaigns that support democracy and therefore also implicitly target individual parties.

— Thorsten FaasThe political scientist distinguished newer democracy campaigns from traditional calls for voter participation.

Faas described calls from churches, trade unions and public figures to participate in elections as longstanding features of campaigns. Newer, he said, are democracy-focused campaigns that also implicitly target particular parties.

Tactical voting ultimately requires coordination of many individual decisions, and that is exactly what these campaigns can achieve.

— Thorsten FaasHe explained why organized strategic-voting campaigns could affect an election result.

Campact points to Saxony’s 2024 state election campaign as an example. It then encouraged strategic voting for the Left to prevent the AfD from gaining a blocking minority in the Dresden state parliament. The Left missed the five-percent threshold but entered parliament after winning several constituency seats. Whether Campact’s campaign made a decisive difference remains unclear.

Current polls put the SPD at 8% to 9% and the Greens at about 6%. The Greens welcome Campact’s effort, while the SPD has responded cautiously. The FDP, polling at about 3% and facing the prospect of leaving the state parliament, is much more critical. Its lead candidate and infrastructure minister, Lydia Hüskens, said the appeals were already "very heavily interfering in the election campaign," particularly given the amount of money involved.

very heavily interfering in the election campaign

— Lydia HüskensThe FDP’s lead candidate criticized strategic-voting appeals, especially given the money being spent.
About this summary

Originally published by Die Zeit in German. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.

More Stories

From Our Blog