DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ Taiwan /Crime & Justice

Taiwan court acquits men accused of fraud in $550,000 company investment

From Liberty Times · () Chinese

Translated from Chinese, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Outcome reported
  • Two women accused two men of fraud after investing $550,000 in a home inspection company, claiming the money was used for "money laundering games."
  • A court in Tainan, Taiwan, ruled that the men were not guilty, citing actual business operations and profit sharing between the partners.
  • The court classified the dispute as a civil matter, noting that the men had compensated the women $150,000 each as part of a mediation agreement.

A dispute over a $550,000 investment in a home inspection company has concluded with a court ruling in favor of two men accused of fraud. The Tainan District Court in Taiwan found the men not guilty, stating that the business was genuinely operational and that profit sharing occurred.

The case began when two women, Ms. Chen and Ms. Zhuang, who worked part-time in home inspections, partnered with two men, Mr. Hu and Mr. Wu, to establish a new company. Ms. Chen invested $450,000 and Ms. Zhuang $100,000, totaling $550,000, into Mr. Wu's account. However, the women later accused the men of fraud after Mr. Hu allegedly sent voice messages in a group chat describing the use of investment funds for "money laundering games" and purchasing tools.

Prosecutors alleged that the men had misappropriated funds and had no intention of forming the company. The defense maintained that the home inspection business was actively running and that disagreements stemmed from differing views on fund usage. The court investigated the matter and found that although the women did not sign the agreement due to perceived unreasonableness, the four individuals had begun accepting inspection jobs under the company's name and maintained separate financial accounts.

The court noted that the women received salaries based on hours worked and monthly dividends, with Ms. Chen earning up to $85,571 and Ms. Zhuang $19,016 in one month, confirming the company's ongoing operations. Judge stated that since the business was operating and distributing profits, the men did not use fraudulent means to obtain the money. The court deemed the dispute over fund usage a civil disagreement stemming from differing investment philosophies, not criminal fraud. With insufficient evidence of illicit intent and a mediation agreement where the men each paid the women $150,000, the court ruled the men not guilty due to insufficient evidence.

DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Liberty Times in Chinese. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.