THE TRIAL OF EL-RUFAI

Adams Shamsildeen, writing for ThisDay, addresses the ongoing trial of El-Rufai, asserting that the legal process must be allowed to unfold without undue interference. The piece contends that advocacy has crossed a line, becoming an unnecessary intrusion into a matter that rightfully belongs within the purview of the judiciary.

The central argument is that the courts are the appropriate venue for resolving such issues, and external pressures or advocacy efforts should not sway the course of justice. Shamsildeen calls for adherence to due process, emphasizing that the law should be permitted to take its natural and intended course.

This perspective underscores the principle of judicial independence and the importance of respecting the legal framework. By advocating for the law to take its course, the article seeks to ensure that the trial is conducted fairly and impartially, free from external influences that could compromise its integrity.