Trump says he will fire Fed chair Powell if he stays beyond mandate

President Donald Trump has escalated his public pressure on Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, issuing a stark warning that he would dismiss the central bank chief if Powell overstays his mandate. With Powell's term set to expire in mid-May, Trump reiterated his long-standing criticism of the Fed's monetary policy, particularly its perceived reluctance to cut interest rates more aggressively.

“

I'll have to fire him, if he is not leaving on time.

"I'll have to fire him," Trump stated in an interview, expressing a clear desire to remove Powell from his position. This move by the Trump administration signals a continued effort to assert influence over the traditionally independent Federal Reserve. The administration has previously targeted the Fed through various means, including an investigation into Powell and attempts to oust Fed governor Lisa Cook.

The situation is complicated by the nomination of former central banker Kevin Warsh as Powell's potential successor. However, Warsh's appointment requires confirmation by the US Senate. His confirmation hearing is scheduled, but faces significant challenges, with some lawmakers expressing concerns that the ongoing investigation into Powell constitutes undue political pressure on the central bank. Senator Thom Tillis, a Republican on the Senate Banking Committee, has indicated he will block Warsh's nomination as long as the investigation persists.

“

I've wanted to fire him.

This procedural deadlock means Powell could legally remain as Fed chair even after his term expires if no successor is confirmed. While it's not unprecedented for a Fed chair to stay on the board after their term, it is rare. Powell, initially appointed by Trump in 2018, was reappointed under President Joe Biden in 2022. From the perspective of a Singaporean publication like CNA, which often provides balanced international reporting, this story highlights the complex interplay between political pressure and central bank independence. The focus would be on the institutional implications and the potential instability caused by such political interference in monetary policy decisions, a critical factor for global financial markets.

“

I'm not playing. I have to find out.